Service

Fine-tuning & Model Adaptation

Fine-tune small open models to hit your quality target at lower cost and latency.

SFT and LoRA fine-tuning on Llama, Mistral, Qwen — or managed OpenAI/Anthropic tunes — for tasks where prompting hit its ceiling.

3–8 weeks Build engagement Docs & handoff included

Problems I solve

  • GPT-4-class costs eating the unit economics
  • General LLMs miss your domain terminology
  • Latency too high for real-time UX
  • Prompt engineering hit its ceiling

What you get

  • Dataset design and labeling pipeline
  • SFT / LoRA training on open models
  • OpenAI / Anthropic fine-tunes when appropriate
  • Evals + rollback plan before ship

Use cases

Domain classifier

Fine-tuned small model matches GPT-4 quality at 20× lower cost.

Structured extraction

Reliable JSON extraction from noisy documents with schema constraints.

Tone / style adaptation

Model that writes in your brand voice across thousands of pieces.

Compliance-safe generation

Fine-tuned model that refuses to produce disallowed outputs.

Examples I've shipped

Support classifier

Qwen 2.5 7BLoRAvLLM

OutcomeF1 0.94 at 8ms p50; replaced GPT-4-mini at ~90% cost cut.

Invoice extractor

Llama 3.1 8BQLoRAModal

OutcomeExtraction accuracy 97.5% on 30-field schema.

How I work

  1. 1

    Task & dataset scoping

    Define exact task, success metric, and data budget.

  2. 2

    Data pipeline

    Labeling, dedup, splits, and eval sets.

  3. 3

    Training

    SFT / LoRA sweeps, checkpoints, safety evals.

  4. 4

    Serving

    vLLM / Modal / Together deployment with autoscaling.

  5. 5

    Eval + ship

    A/B against baseline before rollout.

Deliverables

  • Trained model weights + serving endpoint
  • Eval report vs. baselines
  • Retraining pipeline
  • Cost / latency dashboard

Benefits

  • Cost per call cut 5–20×
  • Sub-100ms latency possible
  • Own the model — no vendor lock-in

Frequently asked questions

Fine-tune vs. RAG vs. prompting?+

RAG for knowledge, prompting for one-off tasks, fine-tuning for repeated structured tasks where cost or latency matters. I benchmark all three before committing.

How much data do I need?+

For LoRA on a well-scoped task, 500–2000 high-quality examples is usually enough. I help build the labeling pipeline if you don't have data yet.

Related services